UPDATED, Dec. 9: The town's Board of Assessors violated the state Open Meeting Law in two cases and has been ordered to release uncensored meeting minutes to the former head of assessments as well as undergo training in the law. The board voted not to appeal "and we will live up to the conditions of the decision," Chairman Kevin Feeley said Dec. 8, adding the board disagrees with the decision.
The Dec. 1 letter to Town Counsel Douglas Heim from Jonathan Sclarsic, assistant attorney general in Division of Open Government, spells out the decisions in two complaints brought by Arlington resident Chris Loreti.
"I never realized how egregiously the Board of Assessors violated Mr. Speidel's rights," Loreti wrote Tuesday, Dec. 2, "in particular by not giving him any advance notice of the executive session at which his performance was discussed, and prohibiting him from even being present during that session."
Asked whether the closed-meeting minutes would be released in full without redactions in 30 days, as ordered, Town Counsel Douglas Heim wrote that he would have to discuss the matter with the assessors.
On Wednesday, Heim responded to questions from YourArlington:
"Overall, I find the Division of Open Government's determination consistent with the Board of Assessor's responses to the complaints, wherein the Board admitted it made errors and explained how and why they occurred."
Asked whether he expects unredacted April 7 executive-session minutes to be released to Speidel in 30 days, he wrote that the Board of Assessors "must first decide whether or not seek review of the Division of Open Government's order. If it does not seek review, I expect unredacted minutes to be provided to Mr. Speidel in a timely fashion."
If released, these minutes would not go to the public, Heim confirmed, "unless the Board decides otherwise."
As to whether the assessor will appeal, Feeley wrote Thursday, Dec. 4: "As board members are unable to discuss any issue except in public session, it is on the agenda for discussion Monday evening."
He declined to comment about the decisions themselves at the time, but deferred to Heim, writing that " this is basically a legal question."
Feeley did provide comment to an Advocate reporter this week.
"I am glad the Division of Open Government is requiring the Board of Assessors to undergo remedial training on the Open Meeting Law," Loreti wrote. "Hopefully, these violations of the law won't be repeated by this board or any others in Arlington. The lack of professionalism demonstrated by the Board of Assessors in ending Mr. Speidel's employment has been an embarrassment to the town."
Sclarsic wrote: "Following our review of the first complaint, we find that the Board failed to provide Mr. Loreti with meeting minutes within ten days of his request. However, the Board took appropriate remedial action in response to the complaint by providing him with the requested minutes.
"With respect to the second complaint, we find that the Board violated the Open Meeting Law by meeting illegally in executive session to discuss the dismissal of an employee without properly noticing the executive session or citing a valid purpose for holding the discussion behind closed doors."
The closed meeting referred to took place April 7; Speidel was terminated April 16.
Sclarsic's letter stated that the assessors posted notice on April 3 for an April 7 meeting. The notice listed 10 topics, including "Minutes," "Old Business," "New Business" and "Discuss Revaluation," but did not list an executive session topic.
During that meeting, the letter says, the board entered into executive session "to discuss exemptions and abatements and not return."
Once it had voted to enter into executive session, the letter says, the board asked Speidel to leave the room. The minutes of the board's April 7 executive session have not been publicly released, so Sclarsic does do not recount them in detail. "However, we note that the minutes include only a few brief sentences memorializing the discussion, and record no votes," he wrote.
"While in executive session, the board discussed its dissatisfaction with Mr. Speidel's work performance. Though no vote was taken, the Board agreed to seek Mr. Speidel's resignation or, in the absence of a resignation, commence the formal process for termination.
"On April 16, the Board's Chair entered into a settlement agreement with Mr. Speidel, ending his employment with the Town.
"On June 2, Mr. Loreti sent a request to the Chair seeking seven sets of meeting minutes. The Chair was in the hospital at the time and unable to respond to the request. Mr. Loreti sent a follow up request to the Chair on June 16. The Chair attended a Board meeting that night, and shared the request with the Board. Mr. Loreti filed his complaint on June 19. The Board provided Mr. Loreti with the requested minutes in its July 14 response to the complaint.
After Speidel left, longtime member of the Board of Assessors Jim Doherty stepped down from the board and later became a candidate for head of assessments. Doherty was offred the job in July but declined to take it.
In September Paul Tierney of Winthrop got the job, and he began work in October.
June 11: Background behind assessor openings
This story was published Tuesday, Dec. 2, 2014, and updated Dec. 9.
FACEBOOK BOX: To see all images, click the PHOTOS link just below